ABSTRACT
Background: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is a cancer prevention tool, yet vaccination coverage among adolescents remains suboptimal in the United States. Research shows significant disparate incidence and mortality rates of HPV-related cancers in Puerto Rico (PR). In 2018, the PR Department of Health (DOH) enacted an HPV vaccine school-entry requirement for adolescents 11 to 12 years old, and on August 2020 extended the requirement to include adolescents up to 16 years old. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, during March-August 2020, national data showed that HPV vaccine uptake rates decreased about 75%. Public health measures, such as stay-at-home orders, may have caused this decline by limiting access to preventive services. Our study explored, using a qualitative assessment, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the implementation of the HPV vaccine school-entry requirement in PR. Method(s): We conducted 26 interviews with stakeholders from schools, DOH employees, Department of education staff, health providers, and community-based organizations from 08/2021-03/2022. Interviews were recorded and transcribed in Spanish. Data were analyzed using applied thematic techniques by two trained coders using Atlas-ti 8. We discussed eight of these interviews among the team to identify major barriers related to the HPV school-entry implementation during the pandemic. Result(s): Our analysis identified the following preliminary emergent themes including: (1) lockdown limitations and access barriers to the vaccine and (2) shifting immunization priorities. Most participants noted that the March 2020 lockdown limited parents' ability to get their kids vaccinated and for schools to monitor the vaccine requirements;however, as vaccination centers and schools re-opened, gradually, vaccination processes increased. Participants described how during the pandemic, public health agencies prioritized the COVID-19 vaccine missing other vaccines that are required for school-entry, including the HPV vaccine. Discussion(s): Continuation of the implementation of the HPV vaccine school-entry requirement was challenging during early stages of the pandemic due to public health measures enacted to stop the spread of COVID-19. Moreover, once the COVID-19 vaccine was available, public heath vaccination priorities shifted. Nonetheless these barriers, efforts to increase HPV vaccine to pre-pandemic rates should continue, including providing educational support to parents, increase vaccine promotion, and creating community collaborations. As new guidelines recommend COVID-19 boosters, for everyone ages 5 years and older, this opportunity could serve to vaccinate against HPV as part of the bundling implementation of the HPV vaccine school-entry requirement.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Individuals and groups against vaccination have used various outlets, such as mass media, social media, and legislative hearings to express doubts about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. In 2018, the Puerto Rico Department of Health included the HPV vaccine as a school-entry requirement for children ages 11-12. Currently, the requirement extends to students ages 11-16. Since the announcement in 2017 of the new school-entry requirement as a preventive cancer strategy, many groups have expressed opposition. Although studies have documented the barriers and facilitators for implementing this policy on the island, qualitative studies assessing stakeholders' views against the implementation of the new requirement are lacking. We aimed to describe stakeholders' perspectives who opposed the HPV vaccine and the implementation as a school-entry requirement in PR. Methods: In-depth interviews (n=8) were conducted between March 2019-January 2020. Healthcare providers, religious leaders, and coalition spokespersons were interviewed. The Consolidated Framework for Research Implementation (CFIR) was used to develop the semi-structured interview guide. CFIR domains (and constructs) included were characteristics of individuals (knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about the HPV vaccination, school-entry requirement, and exemptions), intervention characteristics (current practices, advantages and disadvantages of the implementation), and implementation procedures (planning, commitment of implementers and evaluation). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed in Spanish. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis. Additional constructs were derived from CFIR constructs and emergent codes were included. Results: The most common CFIR domain observed was individual characteristics (knowledge and beliefs), of which HPV hesitancy and vaccine distrust were emergent themes. Arguments against the policy also cited the adverse effects of the vaccine under the intervention characteristics domain (evidence strength and quality). Lastly, excessive government interference was discussed by stakeholders in which concerns regarding the HPV vaccine school-entry requirement and how this policy does not align with their values of religious freedom, parental, educational and sexual rights were mentioned. Conclusion: Despite the recent documented positive impact of the school-entry requirement in HPV immunization rates in PR, many continue to oppose the vaccine mandate. Stakeholders' arguments against the HPV vaccine policy, including knowledge and beliefs, and excessive government interference, echo concerns of other mandated vaccines reported in the literature. Understanding arguments against school-entry requirements is necessary to tailor educational campaigns to increase vaccination rates, which were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, prevent HPV-related cancers, and reduce the hesitancy in of school-entry policies in the future.